Our idea of internship is more closely aligned with a mentorship model, but upside down. All too often a student or intern is given little trust or agency in the process (for good reason) which leads to very limited learning of critical thinking. With high stakes generally present in most business environments, having an untrained individual loose in the command center is a recipe for disaster. However, our hope is to allow a low-stakes (but not no-stakes) environment with mentors providing a safety net while encouraging students to more personally address decisions and projects without fear of catastrophic failure getting in the way.
Mentorship Org Chart.excalidraw
⚠ Switch to EXCALIDRAW VIEW in the MORE OPTIONS menu of this document. ⚠ You can decompress Drawing data with the command palette: ‘Decompress current Excalidraw file’. For more info check in plugin settings under ‘Saving’
Excalidraw Data
Text Elements
Administrative Supervisors
Systems Administrators
Service Admins
Project Managers
Support Tech
SME
Students interns/mentees
KEY:
Flow
Failover
Administrative Mentors
Systems Mentors
Project Mentors
Support Mentors
Mentors
Mentorship based Internship Model
Mentorship based Internship Model
Mentorship based Internship Model
Mentorship based Internship Model
Mentorship based Internship Model
“safety net”
Link to original
Our reasoning
- Empowering Talent: Believing that interns, particularly young ones, are capable of handling responsibility and contributing significantly when given trust.
- Fostering Innovation/Leadership: Thinking that the traditional “command center” approach stifles creativity. By giving interns agency in specific high-stakes projects (under guidance), they might bring fresh perspectives or develop leadership abilities earlier.
- Accelerated Learning: This structure allows interns to learn faster and deeper because they are forced to apply knowledge independently, dealing with real consequences.
Key Strategies
- Clear Structure and Safety Nets: There are defined project scopes, clear expectations (including mistakes), experienced oversight available (even if initially advisory), established processes for interns to seek guidance without being ignored (“untrained individual loose”).
- Trusted Environment Creation: It aims to create a situation where the senior ‘mentor’ is comfortable with and trusts the intern’s growing capability, even while they have agency. The senior provides context, safety, and feedback.
- Skill-Based Agency: The trust isn’t misplaced in general competence but instead is specifically in the skills relevant to their assigned tasks.
- Risk Perception by Businesses: Many companies might still view an untrained intern with agency as a liability, even if it’s low-stakes. This could lead to hesitation about direct involvement or hiring from the program.
- Mitigation: Emphasize your safety nets and clear oversight structures in materials shared with businesses (e.g., contracts that define mentor roles, project risk levels). You might also start small by involving businesses as pilot partners for a few projects before expanding.
- Defining “Low Stakes”: Mistakes could still have consequences if not properly managed. For example, an intern messing up a data entry task or misjudging user feedback might seem minor in isolation but could snowball with poor processes.
- Mitigation: Implement systems where interns can fail safely—perhaps by focusing on projects that don’t affect core revenue streams directly (e.g., internal testing, prototype development) and having experienced mentors catch errors early. Also, tie the model to specific outcomes like learning objectives or measurable results so both parties understand the boundaries.
- Logistics of Finding and Managing Mentors: Coordinating guest mentors from local companies could be challenging due to availability, time zones, or varying levels of expertise.
- Mitigation: Develop a mentor platform where businesses can register as partners easily. This might include training programs for senior mentors on your model (e.g., workshops on empowering juniors) and tools like scheduling apps that ensure consistent engagement.
- Scalability: With many interns sharing fewer projects, you need to balance the load so no one feels too isolated or under-cooked.
- Mitigation: Structure the program with tiers—start with smaller-scale tasks for all participants, then scale up based on mentor availability. For example, use a project management system where mentors assign roles and track progress.
- Measuring Success: How will you gauge whether this model leads to better outcomes? Tracking metrics like intern retention after graduation (for talent), business satisfaction rates (for hiring), or even the innovation impact of projects might be needed.
- Mitigation: Set up baseline comparisons—e.g., with traditional programs—to assess how your model affects performance. You could also collect qualitative feedback through surveys.
Additional Points
By using local technology industry peers as guest mentors, our program also allows fresh industry information and wisdom to be used in projects. Additionally, by using local job creators and hiring managers we allow local businesses a dual value in assisting as mentors - we encourage them to hire directly from our program and reduce the cost of the interview process while also contributing to a better hiring pool in general.
Our goal
Create better outcomes, add experience opportunities, connect employers with qualified candidates that mentors/hiring-managers already know, and create a community for ongoing knowledge sharing and growth.
Notes
To make this idea more robust and increase its chances of success. The following are some loosely described concepts:
- Hybrid Structure: We need to combine elements for better integration—start with traditional training periods but gradually invert them. For instance, first have mentors provide context and feedback during structured sessions, then shift to independent decision-making during actual projects.
- Feedback Loop Mechanism: Create a system where interns can easily seek guidance without it feeling like an interruption. Maybe use digital tools or set aside specific “check-in” times with no expectation for unsolicited advice—focusing on the mentor providing support when requested.
- Business Incentives: Beyond direct hiring, offer businesses other benefits to reduce their perceived risk. For example:
- If they act as mentors (even lightly), it could be tax-deductible expenses or professional development opportunities.
- Use real-time analytics from intern projects to help businesses test ideas cheaply (think “incubator”)—perhaps a shared dashboard showing project outcomes.
- Community Building: Tie this model more tightly into your local context by having events like networking days where interns pitch their work directly to mentors-turned-hiring managers, fostering connections early on. Also, ensure that the program is accessible to diverse talent pools (e.g., through partnerships with community colleges or non-profits) to broaden its impact.
- Legal and Ethical Safeguards: Address liability upfront—have agreements in place where businesses acknowledge the low-stakes nature of projects while providing insurance for mentors. This could be simplified by using templates from organizations like the Small Business Administration (SBA). This model aligns well with trends toward more student-centered, project-based learning environments. I think it’s a great step forward in internships—just remember to communicate your model clearly to all stakeholders so expectations are set right.